T3 Special

Mountain tourism stakeholders seek overhaul of proposed Tourism Bill

Mountain
By Tourism Times
Published at : 24 Aug 2026, 10:42 PM

Stakeholders tell parliamentary committee the bill should set a 20–50-year tourism roadmap and clearly address safety, federal roles, investment and mountain communities.

KATHMANDU: Mountain tourism stakeholders have called for a comprehensive overhaul of the proposed Tourism Bill 2081, arguing that the legislation should provide a long-term national roadmap for tourism rather than focus primarily on licensing, regulation, penalties and administrative control.

Representatives of Nepal's major tourism bodies - the Nepal Mountaineering Association (NMA), Trekking Agencies' Association of Nepal (TAAN), Nepal Association of Tour and Travel Agents (NATTA), Hotel Association Nepal (HAN), Nepal Tourism Board (NTB) and the Expedition Operators Association of Nepal (EOAN) — appeared before Parliament's International Relations and Tourism Committee today to press for major changes to the Tourism Bill, 2081, with several groups calling for a comprehensive rewrite.

Lawmaker Mingma Gyabu Sherpa said the discussion focused particularly on reforms needed to make Nepal’s mountaineering, trekking and adventure tourism sectors safer, better organised, sustainable and internationally competitive.

Mountain tourism is a vital part of Nepal’s identity, economy, and employment. Therefore, it is essential to establish an effective legal framework that recognizes and protects the interests of mountain communities, climbers, guides, tourism professionals, and all relevant stakeholders. Strong policy reform and collaboration among stakeholders are essential for a prosperous and sustainable future for Nepal’s mountain tourism, MP Sherpa added.

TAAN President Sagar Pandey said TAAN, NMA and other mountain tourism stakeholders had presented a “strong and united voice” on the proposed legislation and submitted amendment proposals to the parliamentary committee.

He said the draft should be comprehensively rewritten where necessary so that the new law reflects the realities and future needs of Nepal’s trekking, mountaineering, adventure and wider tourism sectors.

The most detailed critique came from Rishi Ram Bhandari, Secretary-General of EOAN and a former NTB board member, who told the committee the bill remains vague and control-oriented despite a decade of consultations, and lacks a clear long-term vision for the sector. He said the draft as ambiguous, control-oriented, and lacking a clear strategy to make Nepali mountaineering safe, competitive, and internationally credible. He pointed to inconsistent terminology—including the definition of "mountaineer"—and the state's minimal role throughout the provisions as major weaknesses.

Bhandari said the federal tourism law should function as a 20–50 year national roadmap covering infrastructure, conservation, carrying capacity, investment protection, and community benefits, rather than being limited to licensing and penalties. He noted the bill neglects key tourism sectors beyond casinos and mountaineering, fails to define coordination between federal, provincial, and local governments, and omits workforce qualification standards for guides and sirdars. He also criticized vague language leaving matters "as prescribed" to the Department, which could lead to arbitrary decisions, and the absence of a growth plan for tourist numbers and employment.

He urged a shift from punitive control to business facilitation, with protections for investment and consumer rights embedded in the Act. He called for practical currency rules allowing remote businesses to accept Nepali rupees with proof of foreign exchange, and proposed that Everest climbers from 2028 Spring season onward must have summited an 8,000m UIAA peak or a 7,000m Nepali peak. He also recommended clearer peak-opening criteria, local government involvement, cultural safeguards, and state-determined liaison officer standards with centralized deployment for peaks with four or more teams.

Bhandari also called for clearer arrangements for liaison officers, mountain cleaning, search and rescue, dead-body management and insurance, arguing that some proposed obligations may be difficult to implement under existing insurance provisions. He proposed separate mountain-cleaning and mountaineering-support welfare funds and suggested that part of the mountaineering royalty could be allocated to mountain cleaning, liaison officers and search-and-rescue operations undertaken by the state.

Finally, he insisted that all adventure tourism standards—for trekking, travel, and guiding—must be explicitly defined in the Act itself, not left to provincial or departmental regulations, to ensure consistency and accountability.

The discussion was attended by representatives of major tourism organisations, government officials and other tourism stakeholders.

The submissions from NTB, NMA, EOAN, TAAN and other stakeholders now form part of the ongoing clause-wise review of the Tourism Bill, 2081, by the House committee. No amendments have yet been adopted; the bill, as passed by the National Assembly, remains under discussion in the House of Representatives.


Comment


Deependra Chapai

Nepal’s Tourism Is Different From Almost Anywhere Else. Our Strength Is Not Simply Mountains—it Is The Unique Combination Of Adventure, Culture, Spirituality, Biodiversity And Living Communities. Any New Tourism Law Or Policy Must Protect This Identity Rather Than Treat Tourism Only As A Business Or Revenue-generating Sector. What We Urgently Need Is A 30-year National Tourism Roadmap, With Clear Targets, Responsibilities, Budgets And Accountability—not Policies That Change With Every Government. We Are Already Seeing Serious Warning Signs On The Ground: Trekking Trails Being Destroyed By Unplanned Roads, Unmanaged Solid Waste, Declining Biodiversity, Erosion Of Local Cultures And Heritage, Overcrowding In A Few Destinations, And Tourism Workers Remaining Economically Vulnerable Despite Years Of Service. We Cannot Sell A Pile Of Garbage At A Remote Himalayan Destination As “tourism.” We Cannot Continue Accepting Poor Hygiene, Unsafe Trails And Weak Safety Standards As Normal. And We Should Not Build Our Tourism Image Around Pity—“look How Difficult Life Is Here”—when Nepal Has The Potential To Deliver World-class, Professionally Managed Tourism. Quality Tourism Requires Quality Workers. Guides, Porters, Cooks And Other Tourism Workers Need Proper Training, Certification, Grading, Insurance, Fair Wages And Opportunities For Professional Growth. Someone Who Has Carried Loads At High Altitude For 20 Years Should Not Still Be Treated As An Unskilled Worker With No Pathway Forward. We Also Need To Address Basic Governance Problems: Clear Professional Categories For Guides, Porters, Trekking Agencies And Other Tourism Businesses. Fair And Transparent Taxation Appropriate To Each Profession And Business Model. Stronger Safety And Emergency-response Standards. Food, Water And Hygiene Standards On Trekking Routes. Sustainable Waste-management Systems From Cities To Remote Mountain Villages. Fair Pricing And Protection Against Unhealthy Competition And Exploitation. Better Distribution Of Tourism Benefits To Local Communities. Most Importantly, We Need To Protect The Trails Themselves. A Trekking Trail Is Not Simply A Place Where A Road Has Not Yet Been Built. It Is Part Of The Landscape, Culture And Experience. For Example, Where Communities Need Reliable Energy, Let Us Invest In Appropriate Renewable Energy And Hydropower Solutions Rather Than Destroying Trekking Trails With Unnecessary Roads. Where Roads Are Genuinely Necessary, Plan Them Around Tourism, Environment And Local Livelihoods—not Through The Heart Of Established Trekking Routes Without Considering The Long-term Consequences. We Need Tourism Development Where Local People Receive The Maximum Possible Benefit From Tourism In Their Own Communities—better Health Services, Education, Clean Water, Waste Management, Connectivity, Skills And Dignified Employment. Imagine If Nepal Developed A Mountain Waste-management Model So Effective That The World Came Here To Learn From Us. Imagine If Our Trekking Workers Were Among The Best-trained Adventure Professionals In The World. Imagine If Our Villages Could Preserve Their Architecture, Traditions And Biodiversity While Earning A Dignified Income From Tourism. It Is Possible. We Already Have The Mountains, Culture, Communities And Experience. What We Lack Is Long-term Vision, Coordination And Political Commitment. So The Real Question For The Proposed Tourism Bill Is Not Only “What Should The Law Say?” It Is: How Visionary Are We Willing To Be About Nepal’s Tourism For The Next 30 Years? Those Of Us Working On The Trails Every Season See Both The Opportunities And The Damage Firsthand. Please Listen To The People Who Live And Work There—not Only Those Sitting In Offices. Protect The Trails. Protect The Culture. Protect Biodiversity. Professionalize The Workers. Empower Local Communities. Build Tourism For The Next Generation, Not Just The Next Season.